Pro, or anti-BNPP?
Pro.
Government pays $800,000 something every year for maintenance costs..in hopes of getting the plant to function someday :<
There are risks.. like nearby volcanoes which may lead to activate the fault line near the plant..
But if after the plant check-up, BNPP turns out to have not much defects. I go for fixing it and improving it so we can use it.
Why spend money on something you won’t use? :|
Besides, other countries have lotsssssss of nuclear plants (like Japan).. (->for those who say that the gov’t should just build a new one, somewhere safer instead of using BNPP)
